Tuesday, 12 October 2010

A blog about blogging

So, I’ve been busy blogging. Not here though (because there are only 24 hours in a day and this blog doesn’t earn me any money); I’ve been blogging for my company and very time consuming it has proved to be.

Although (good) blogs are personal and written by an individual to reflect their personal opinion on a subject, if they are written on behalf of an organization they still need to support the organization’s goals and objectives. With that in mind, my business partner and I drew up a list of topics we wanted to blog about. We came up with 30 or 40 in a very short time and then sorted them into some sort of prioritised order. From there we each sat down to write a few each week and we started posting them a few weeks ago. They are all very business orientated and focus on marketing related topics.

The blog ads a more human element to our site and gives readers a better feel for our work style and opinions than just having the static text on the various web pages we spent weeks putting together. Trying to write multiple blog entries in a consistent style (tone of voice and technical level) over several weeks proved challenging, especially given that the web site itself went through several iterations as we experimented and found which different styles worked best for us.

Our editorial schedule was definitely a good way to start and means we now have a few blog posts in reserve. This is important since we want to make sure we post fresh content each week (at least) but don’t always have the time each week to sit down and produce a new entry.

Anyway, now all that is out of the way I can get on with my day job and maybe get back to keeping this blog a bit more up to date.

Oh, and if you want to see our business page and blog, follow this link; www.strategicmarketingadvice.com

Friday, 6 August 2010

Why are things so complicated these days?

Wow, has it really been a year since I last posted a blog update? How time flies when you’re not very busy.

Instead of sitting around doing not very much I’ve been trying to get fit, trying to learn Spanish and I’ve taken up fishing again, although fishing seems to involve lots of sitting around doing not very much so that didn’t work out very well.

As I was pursuing these various activities it struck me how incredibly complicated things are these days. There is a science behind everything these days and no matter how simple something could be, there is always someone or some company that will make it complicated so they can charge huge fees to help you master it.

I used to go fishing when I was at school. At the time I thought I had the very latest equipment including a carbon fibre fishing rod. These days fishing has to be one of the most complicated sports known to man. The array of tackle some people take to the lake or river is incredible. They take so much they can only fish in places they can drive the car too otherwise they have no way of getting all their fishing tackle in place.

They take hours to assemble several rods that sit on electronic bite detectors and they use man made baits that come straight out of an advanced laboratory. They use fish detectors to locate their prey and have decide all sorts of things before they can even cast their line. Why is it so incredibly complicated? Did the fish all suddenly change and are they now all incredibly clever and wise to the fisherman’s tricks?

I borrowed my 8 year old son’s fishing rod and plodded down to the river with a bag of bread and I managed to catch a few fish. I even managed to catch a couple of big fish. There was not a single item of electronics in my fishing box. One rod was more than enough for me as I was frequently only waiting a few minutes before bites. It really doesn’t have to be complicated.

Trying to learn Spanish and trying to get fit were both good examples of how complicated things are these days. To learn Spanish I was given a computer based course that needed an internet connection in order to update itself before it would work. It bombarded me with all sorts of pictures and sounds and videos and I worked my way through all sorts of speech recognition modules and multiple choice tests. I plodded on and at the end of it I still can’t speak Spanish. I think the techno wizardry got in the way of the actual learning process.

I wanted to lose a bit of weight and get a bit fitter so joined a gym. I was assigned an exercise program and shown how loads of different machines work and how to do all sorts of different exercises. I plodded on for months sticking to my program and looking in the mirror each morning trying to spot the difference.

Not much happened until the sun came out. Then I started running along the river and lo and behold, the weight came off and within a couple of months I was able to run for 40 minutes at a good clip without needing oxygen or an ambulance. Job done.

From now on, I am going to think of the simplest way something can be done and only when that fails will I make things complicated.

Thursday, 16 July 2009

Notes from a marketing round table

I recently attended a very interesting round table event with senior marketing executives from Microsoft, Toshiba, SAS, Global 360 and McAfee among others. The conversation covered the impact of the recession on how their marketing teams operate.

Most people agreed that as marketing teams have been cut, and the workload on the remaining staff has increased, maintaining staff morale has become a major priority for team leaders and managers.

Another interesting change is that as development budgets have been reduced, product lifecycles have been extended. For marketing, this means that teams that were almost exclusively launch focused, getting one product out of the door and moving straight on to the next launch, they now have to sustain demand for products over a longer period. This involves running mid-life kicker campaigns and other activity that some marketing teams, especially in consumer hardware markets may not have been involved in for several years.

Alliance and partner marketing campaigns are now much more in favour than they were 12 months ago. As budgets have been squeezed, it makes sense to combine resources with a close partner and run joint campaigns on a shared cost basis. Of course, there are many other upsides to running good partner campaigns but it was generally agreed that few marketing agencies are strong in this area.

Everyone in the room was working harder to justify their marketing budget with a much greater emphasis on measurable activity that had a very clear set of success/failure criteria set well in advance. The same was true of customers who now had to produce far more detailed business cases in order to get budget approval on major capital purchases approved by their board. This meant marketing having to work more closely with sales to provide them with the more focused and more detailed collateral required to support the sales cycle.

Outside of the public sector, environmental messaging has been toned down because it is harder to convince businesses that “green” products have a strong, short term ROI. Messages about consolidation and virtualization are now more focused on the reduced cost aspect of simplifying your IT environment with less emphasis on the reduced power consumption and reduced carbon footprint.

The general feeling was that things have now stabilized and they were likely to be operating in their current form for the rest of this year with things starting to change in the first half of 2010. It was a very interesting meeting and the overall feeling was positive although everyone agreed it will be a challenging year and hitting targets will require lots of hard work.

Friday, 19 June 2009

When a business ignores the customer...

I have been following the Formula 1 shenanigans for the last few months (years) and it really reminds me of some businesses I’ve worked in. For those not close to the sport, Formula 1 is basically the pinnacle of motorsport. The world’s major car manufacturers compete to build the fastest cars in the world using the very latest technology. The world’s best drivers then race each other to produce an incredible spectacle (if you like that type of thing). However, there is another side to Formula 1, which is the business side; it is one of the world’s richest sports, generating billions of dollars of revenues each year with each team spending hundreds of millions pounds per year on building the ultimate racing car.

Over the last few years the owners of the commercial rights have been trying to take the sport in a slightly different direction by capping the team budgets and making it easier for new (less technically sophisticated) teams to join the series. The major motor manufacturers like Toyota, Renault, Ferrari etc are opposed to this and so they have now announced they are setting up a rival series. The commercial rights holders want more revenues and a bigger starting grid, the car manufacturers want to build and race the ultimate racing cars as part of a huge branding and marketing exercise.

I can’t help but side with the current Formula 1 teams. As a spectator I want to see the ultimate cars being pushed to their limits by the world’s best drivers. For me, it’s not about the size of the grid or the number of teams in the league, it’s about the quality. The current commercial rights holders don’t seem to get this and seem intent on doing everything they can to maximise revenues from TV rights regardless of how the customer (me) feels about it.

I’ve worked in companies like that. They have done the things that they thought were good for their business, or that they wanted to do, such as adding new features that were interesting to develop or withdrawing a mature product from sale in favour of a newer version, but they didn’t ask the customer what THEY wanted. I am a firm believer that with only a few exceptions, doing what the customer wants is the best thing a business can do, regardless of what anyone else inside or outside the company may think. In an era when running an online survey or a forum is cheap and easy, there really is no excuse for not talking to every customer and getting their feedback. In fact, I’d say it is now essential for business survival, as the Formula 1 commercial rights holders may be about to find out!

Monday, 27 April 2009

Everything’s different now...

I left the UK in September 2001 and have just moved back after lengthy periods in Texas and then Paris. Obviously I have been in the UK repeatedly in the intervening period but they were always short, busy visits. It is only since I have fully moved back that I have really had time to notice some of the changes that have taken place.

Two things in particular struck me within the first few days of being back. The first is that quality of food in the UK is now excellent; at least as good as that in other countries if not better. The choice is huge and the prices are very reasonable (especially compared to Paris). This observation applies to both raw food supplies for home consumption and also to catered food in restaurants and bars. Ten or twenty years ago the UK was a laughing stock when it came to food. Today, it would be easy to argue that the food in London is better than any other large city in the world in terms of choice and value.

The second big change I have noticed since my return is how the skyline of the average suburban street has changed (does my neighbourhood of Richmond Upon Thames count as average?). It seems that almost everyone has converted their loft into useable living space. I was amazed at just how many extensions and conversions have been carried out in less than 10 years. The huge growth in property prices has forced everyone to make use of every inch of space and has also allowed them to borrow money to fund the developments. If you didn’t live through this change and adjust your perception over time, it hits you hard and the new view makes you think of England as being crowded.

I am sure there will be lots of other changes I will notice over the coming weeks but these stand out for me after just a few days in my new home.

Friday, 17 April 2009

Why do I hang onto things?

I am in the process of packing up an apartment full of stuff ready to leave Paris and move to the UK. I have lost count of how many times I have moved house in the last 10 years but every time, I find myself packing up large collections of things that I never use.

For example, I have about 900 CD’s that I burned onto my PC some years back. I play all my music from my PC or my iPod and I don’t actually have a dedicated CD player anymore (although the DVD can play them of course), and yet I still drag them around with me. I also have about 500 books, some of which I have had well over a quarter of a century and I spent most of the day yesterday packing these into boxes and moaning about it to my friends on Facebook.

So, if I play music off my PC and iPod and if I have a backlog of new books to read that stop me reading my old books for a second time, why do I lug these things around the world with me repeatedly?

In the case of the CD’s I defend myself with the argument that I like the sleeve booklet and enjoy looking through the packaging to read all the lyrics and thank-you notes and that if I lost the contents of my PC then I would need them again. Both arguments are complete rubbish of course; I never look at the sleeve notes and my PC is fully backed-up.

When it comes to the books I suppose there is a bit of a stronger defence in that it is more difficult to back up a book and that it is traditional to keep a library of one’s reading collection. However, I know for a fact that I will never read the vast majority of my collection again; some are simply the wrong genre and others were rubbish the first time I read them and they are unlikely to improve with a second visit. When I was a teenager I read a lot of science fiction and these days I struggle to get past the first page of a sci-fi book, so really there is no excuse and they need to go.

So the question is; why am I so attached to these large collections of things I am highly unlikely to ever use again? In both cases I could probably turn them into money if I put a bit of time into selling them.

I hate to admit it but I think I am a hoarder. It is only the fact that I have moved house every couple of years that has stopped me having a yard full of lumps of wood and bits of metal that “I never know when I might need”, and a garage full of broken electrical items that “will come in useful one day”. It is only the fact that my better half has a sense of fashion that stops me keeping clothes from 20 years ago on the basis I will wear them again when I walk the dog around a muddy field on a rainy day. (The fact that we don’t have a dog is irrelevant).

If you know of a tablet I can take to cure me of my hoarding then send me the details. In the meantime I am off to pack up the last of my books before we move...

Thursday, 16 April 2009

What happened to old fashioned service standards?

Twenty years ago, I remember seeing a few jobs in the paper that appealed and applying either direct or via an agency. Of course, way back then, you had to use a new fangled word processor to put together your covering letter and CV and then you’d use snail mail to send it to the company in question.

Without fail, a few days later, a smart looking letter would arrive back, thanking me for my interest in the company and the position and advising me when the company would start the review process, and letting me know when they would next be in touch.

Over the last few weeks I have seen a few jobs listed in places like the Sunday Times or online on various job boards and I’ve taken time to craft a letter and send it off. These days the word processor is not such a mystery and the application is sent by email. In many cases, the company actually use automatic content scanners to review CV’s and extract the contents into the format they like to hold it in.

However, with very exceptions (you know who you are but I will mention Calibre 1 and VMware who were exceptional) no one has even acknowledged receipt of my application. In almost every instance my application, even when sent to a named individual, has simply disappeared into a black hole.

What is wrong with HR departments and recruitment companies these days? Don’t they realise that applying for a new job is a very big thing for most people? We need to know you received the application and it was readable. We need to know when you are likely to start short listing people.

In most cases I have been applying for fairly senior jobs in reasonably large, professional organizations. I am assuming these positions are important for the hiring company and they want to set the right impression and be seen as a great company that treats its staff and customers in a way that shows they care. Simply ignoring people who have expressed an interest in working for the company just doesn’t set the right tone!

Even a basic auto-responder that sends out a standard response acknowledging receipt is better than nothing.

That’s my rant for the day. (And there goes any opportunity I had of getting another job!)

Thursday, 9 April 2009

A trip back in time...

This week, to help a friend out, I went and stood on an exhibition stand in London’s Olympia for a couple of days. The event I was attending was called “Screen Expo 2009”and was aimed at users of Digital Signage.

Digital Signage is a relatively new marketing technique (also called DOOH - Digital Out Of Home). Basically, marketing messages can now be delivered to remote displays located anywhere – on streets, on building walls, in stores and so on. Marketers have been showing their adverts to people waiting in Post Office queues for years but modern Digital Signage goes far beyond the simple display of television adverts on screens located in waiting rooms.

Firstly, digital signage can be interactive. For example, images can be projected onto the inside of the glass in a shop window and then a viewer standing on the other side (in the street) can touch the glass to interact with the image, maybe to zoom in on something or to get more information or to view the image from a different angle.

Also, digital signage is starting to become “intelligent” and many displays now include sensors that use some sophisticated software to gain an understanding of who is looking at the display. If the software detects that the viewer is male (or predominantly male in the case of multiple viewers) it will select male relevant content to show on the display. A good example would be a car showroom where images of a car may be being shown on a wall display. If the display detects that a woman is watching, it will start showing family and safety related content. However, if a male is watching, it will show more performance related content. Digital signage brings together almost every part of a company’s marketing activity such as their online web based content and puts it in the heart of a store or on the street. Instead of just showing adverts, the content can educate or entertain and really engage with the viewer.

So, why did such 21st century wizardry take me back in time? Well, the exhibition I was attending reminded me of the computer industry 20 years ago. The exhibition hall was packed with companies offering various components of the solution, each with the expectation that the prospects wandering around the hall would know what they needed and would be prepared to put it all together.

Some years ago, the computer industry sold its products to people that really understood how it all worked and how it all went together. The marketing was all aimed at the tech savvy buyer and was highly technical, feature driven and complicated. Can you image buying a car by deciding which engine you want and I don’t just mean what size, I mean would you like an engine from manufacturer A, B or C and then deciding what size you wanted. Then you would choose your transmission system supplier, your chassis supplier and so on and you’d hope all this stuff worked together. You’d either be a highly skilled mechanic who could build the finished car yourself or you would need to employ the services of a specialist company that would put all the component parts together for you.

Even though car manufacturers themselves make only a small part of the vehicle these days and rely on component suppliers to provide them with everything from spark plugs and batteries, switches and tyres, they still deliver you a complete finished product that you can simply drive away from the showroom without needing to do anything more than sign the hand-over form.

These days, you can buy many computer systems in a similar way. A large manufacturer sources components from the likes of Intel and Microsoft and they deliver a system that is just about ready to go in just a few minutes with the systems pre-configured as ordered and all the software pre-installed.

Well, the digital signage industry is nowhere near as advanced. In order for a large retailer to start using digital signage in their stores they need to be experts in so many technologies and marketing techniques that it is not difficult to understand why such a powerful technology is struggling to gain real momentum.
I am not even sure it is a technology sale. Having spoken to some of the confused and dazed delegates at the event it was clear that what they wanted to do was have a marketing conversation about how to convert window shoppers into in-store buyers or how help customers understand complex products without employing an army of highly trained shop assistants. They were not in the least bit interested in discussing which cabling topology or wireless standard to adopt or which display mounting arrangement worked best with large format plasma displays.

My friend’s stand (Rocket Communications) was offering an end-to-end service that included content design and it was like an oasis in the middle of a hi-tech battle ground. Marketing folks wandering around looking for a way to up-sell cosmetics in the concessions area of their department store suddenly found themselves talking to people that understood marketing and who wanted to discuss messaging and all the things they worked on every day. They would engage with us for a while and talk to humans in plain English before they had to step off the stand and head back into the world of speeds and feeds and digital multi channel encoders with HD signal splitters and signal repeaters.

Once the digital signage industry starts talking to its customers in a language they understand and offering solutions they can actually use, without needing to recruit a translator, I think we will all be amazed at how clever some of the solutions are and how much more interesting they can make a trip to the shops.

Friday, 3 April 2009

A strange thing happened to me today...

Someone called me to see how I was doing. I know, that doesn't seem so strange but think about it for a few seconds. How often these days do people use the telephone to call you up for nothing other than to see how you are? I'm not talking about a business call or your weekly scheduled call with your mum, I mean the out-of-the-blue call from someone you are not close to.

Just 10 years ago it probably happened quite frequently but these days, there are so many other ways to communicate that people seem to have stopped using the telephone.

The caller in question is a very senior executive at a large media company in London (he's a busy guy). We have done some business together over the last few years and had a beer together at a corporate hospitality event but our relationship has always been a business relationship. Imagine how surprised I was then to receive a call from him asking how I was. That just doesn't happen very often these days does it? Nowadays people twitter or blog or email or text or Facebook. Anything but pick up the phone.

I was expecting some ulterior motive, maybe he needed a favour or request for help but no, he just wanted to see how the job hunt was coming along and if he could help.

I have always liked the chap in question and found him to be a good person to work with in business. He knows his stuff, he does the things he says he will and he always gets the job done. But now I know he actually likes me enough to pick the phone up and see how I am, even though I am not in a position to give him any business right now, means a lot to me. If he is prepared to look out for me when I can't spend money with him, imagine the service I'll get when I return as a customer! That simple phone call has moved our relationship forward no end and built a huge amount of loyalty.

Another angle I take from this is aimed at all those sales people out there using all those new fangled tools to keep in touch with their prospects and clients. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, MSM, Messenger, email, blogs and texts are all great but they are all limited. Nothing beats a good old fashioned chat with your contact. Pick up the phone and talk to people, you'd be surprised where a conversation can lead you. Better still, visit people once in a while. You'd be shocked at the difference real face-to-face contact makes vs. the sanitised electronic communications most of us use 99% of the time.

Yet another angle is; what happened to the rest of my 'mates'? Where are you when I need you? Call me!

And finally; I have been hunting for a packing and moving company and I have been receiving email quotes. Only one company has taken the time to follow up with a phone call to check I had received the email and ask if I needed anything else. The caller engaged me in a conversation, wormed a few questions out of me and started a conversation. I built up a bit of trust and she moved her company to the top of my list of potential movers. It works!

Friday, 27 March 2009

I have a theory...

Recessions are tough. They test every part of every system. In business, a recession exposes weaknesses and drives change. It is not only the limits of admin systems and processes that get exposed but also the limits of the people working in the organizations that are affected by the recession.

Good recruiters appoint people with the right skills to do a particular job. Obviously they also hope that new hire will also have potential to grow and develop over time. Once they are onboard a good company will get them up to speed and get them working to somewhere near their maximum potential. Over time, training courses and exposure to new ideas and processes will help the individual develop but in general, most people in good companies are working somewhere near the top of their ability at any given point in time (otherwise, they are bored and the company is overpaying for talent it is not using).

When a recession comes along, it forces change at a rapidly increased rate, maybe more rapidly than new skills can be learned. Overnight, the trading environment can change in many ways (not always for the worse) and organizations need to change to keep up or maintain and grow their lead. This requires the individuals inside those organizations to drive that change and that is where the people who were already working at their limit can find themselves outside their comfort zone. People that have been with an organization for a long time and who are working hard every day to get their job done will find it hard to suddenly start innovating and coming up with new ways to approach their job.

When a recession bites, many organizations will trim any perceived excess and if there are people who are clearly not going to raise their game to cope with the new, more demanding environment, they will be let go. That doesn’t necessarily mean their role is redundant (although their job loss may be communicated like that) and new blood may well be brought in to drive the required change.

In additional to some potential legal traps, the challenge this gives to organizations is how do they bring on new, more highly skilled talent which probably costs more, at a time when they are likely to be reducing costs? It is a brave company that increases its wage bill during a recession, but sometimes that may be just what is needed to make the most of the opportunity.

The other side of this theory works for those people that find themselves out of a job in the middle of a recession. Although many firms are letting staff go, there will still be job opportunities out there with companies that are not just downsizing but who are also changing team members. Keep looking, they are out there, and they are probably with the most forward thinking and ambitious company you could hope to work for.